Dear editor

There is no point discussing if we do not see my question in the same direction.
It was said that sometimes unnecesary arguments are a result of misunderstanding.

My question which was based on Manua'ri's first posting can be answered in just two ways, either yes/no or agree/disagree.

Why I raised this question to Manua'ri is because he was saying that allegations about misused are baseless or cannot be substantiated and that I MPs are actually putting the Funds into good use until proven otherwise. However he also acknowledge that the Fund is also abused. And here, Manua'ri seems to be comfortable with abuse and proper use going hand-in-hand.

Therefore my question was to ensure whether he is really comfortable with that.

So koroni how could I knew the answer if it was not given?

Hope this might help.